By TJ Small | Published
Warner Bros. has been under fire from general audiences non-stop over the past few years, due to a series of decisions made by its higher-ups that seem to spit in the face of creative filmmakers and consumers everywhere. As you may already know, the studio has delayed a series of long-awaited films that were already fully finished and ready for release, stripped several beloved projects from their streaming homes, and generally given WGA and SAG-AFTRA union workers an incredibly difficult time. During joint strikes last year. Now, according to an article in The Guardian, Warner Bros. has put a stop to the success of the Clint Eastwood movie. Juror No. 2By preventing the film from getting a wide release across the United States.
Juror No. 2 will not get a wide release
The situation with Warner Bros. and… Juror No. 2 It’s very strange, as the film should be a big winner for the studio, at least on paper. The film touts writing and direction from an acclaimed filmmaker with decades of Hollywood work, a riveting cast, and a shocking narrative that focuses on a family man who serves as a juror, presiding over a crime he may have committed himself. .
Despite these positive signs, David Zaslav and company seem committed to preventing the film from succeeding at the box office, by restricting its release to fewer than 50 theaters within the country.
Warner Bros. buries Clint Eastwood movie
Despite the slow rolling strategy of Juror No. 2 In US theatres, the film has already opened in over 300 cinemas across the UK. Given the film’s exceptional American release, it seems odd that Warner Bros. would alienate such a large portion of the film Juror No. 2Potential audience. To make matters even stranger, it appears that the studio will not submit the film for Oscar consideration, which also indicates a general lack of confidence in the film’s expected performance.
Warner Bros. also made the strange and unprecedented move of choosing to black out its box office earnings Juror No. 2. Such a practice is carried out almost exclusively through films that premiere via streaming. To an outside observer, these moves seem like damage control from a studio that has absolutely no confidence in the success or quality of its project — but what could make Warner Bros. carry such fear into this film?
Eastwood’s long career has consistently produced financially successful hits, even when it lacked critical praise, so there really should be no reason for Warner Bros. to show such a lack of confidence in… Juror No. 2. The 94-year-old director may be facing internal issues with Warner Bros. executives, and his film is being punished for it. This theory has been put forward by fans since Eastwood refused to attend Juror No. 2premiere, although neither party has said anything to confirm the existence of a behind-the-scenes beef.
Clint Eastwood’s last film
Even so, many fans seem to think so Juror No. 2 This will be Clint Eastwood’s last time directing, considering his advanced age, which means the film has to be treated with a certain level of respect. Whether you’re a fan of Eastwood’s work or not, this certainly rings alarm bells that Warner Bros. is handling its own financial investment in it. Juror No. 2 Very bad. This is one in a long list of examples that paint Warner Bros. as an incompetent, money-driven company headed by small investors who have no understanding of the art nor of filmmaking in general.
source: The Guardian