Prince Andrew, Duke of York, is facing scrutiny after being reported to police for allegedly using a false name to register a business. The 64-year-old prince is accused of operating under the pseudonym “Andrew Inverness” when he set up Naples Gold Limited in 2002, working with sports retail magnate Johan Eliasch.
The complaint was filed by Graham Smith, chief executive of Republic, a major anti-monarchy organization. Smith brought the matter to the attention of Scotland Yard, claiming that Andrew’s use of a fictitious name constitutes filing false information with Companies House, the UK’s official company register.
The Metropolitan Police are currently reviewing the complaint to decide whether further action is warranted. Smith expressed his concerns to the Telegraph, saying: “Andrew must be held to the highest standards” and criticized the royal family for apparently believing they could act without accountability. This incident raises questions about the integrity of royal conduct, particularly in the context of ongoing discussions about transparency and accountability in public life.
Also Read: Cardi B Drops Baby Bombshell Just One Month After Divorce Drama!
The use of the name “Andrew Inverness” appears to be linked to one of Andrew’s lesser-known titles, that of Earl of Inverness, which was conferred on him by Queen Elizabeth II in 1986 when he married Sarah Ferguson. This title has now become a focal point of the allegations against him.
Smith highlighted that while providing false information may seem minor, it is part of a wider fraud problem facing the UK. He noted: “While no such fraud is alleged here, Andrew must surely be held to the highest standards. » His remarks highlight growing concern about the risk of abuse of power by people in high positions, particularly those associated with the monarchy.
In related news, it has emerged that Urramoor Limited, the company which manages Prince Andrew’s private investments, has requested its dissolution. Documents submitted to Companies House last week indicate that Urramoor, over which Andrew had “significant control”, is being deregistered. The move comes just a year after the company received a mysterious £210,000 bailout from an anonymous donor.
The funding, which was issued in the form of non-redeemable shares, was secured in December 2023, shortly after Urramoor found itself in a precarious financial situation, with a debt of £208,000. The company was initially established in 2013 as HRH Andrew Inverness, approximately 18 months after Andrew’s trade envoy role was revoked due to his controversial ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The decision to dissolve Urramoor was officially signed by the company’s director, Arthur Lancaster, on January 3. The closure raises new questions about the prince’s financial dealings and management of his investments, particularly in light of recent allegations regarding his use of a false name.
Also read: Céline Dion shines during her triumphant return to the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympic Games
As the investigation unfolds, it remains to be seen what impact this situation will have on the reputation of Prince Andrew and the wider royal family. The allegations and subsequent police scrutiny bring to the forefront questions of accountability among public figures, particularly those who have historically enjoyed some immunity from scrutiny.
The royal family has faced increasing pressure in recent years to demonstrate transparency and accountability in its actions. The allegations against Prince Andrew and the police investigation that followed could represent a pivotal moment in this ongoing dialogue about the responsibilities of those in positions of power.
As public interest in the royal family continues, many will be closely following how this situation develops and what it means for the future of the monarchy in the United Kingdom.