Written by Drew Andh Published
Nowadays, we have become anesthetic for film factories and studios that make changes to films and TV shows after their initial release to the public. Whether it erases the Starbucks Cup from the world of Westeros or touched a new dead actor, it has been digitally reserved, any ideas came out of the “final pieces” from the window.
A great reason to encourage this situation actually returns to our favorite contract, yes: the nineties!
In 1992, Ridley Scott was re -released Blade It was called “the outlet cut”. It has made major changes to the theatrical release that many fans of the movie are already preferred.
Just a year ago Blade Runner: Director The release, a complement to Box was decreased in the eighties of the last century in theaters and rejected by the public and critics. By 1995, the director of this film obtained an opportunity to release the director and change the film to an effective degree other than history.
I drew Lietsch for Giant Freakin Robot and that is why Haylander II: acceleration to fail.
I love Hailand
Well, a real fast for anyone who has not seen Haylander.
Number 1: See Haylander. This is the entire list. seriously, Haylander surprising. It is one of the most fun and elegant fictional action movies in the 1980s.
If you do not want to bring joy in life for some reason, here is the basic idea of HaylanderThere are immortals here on Earth. They are to fight each other for a legendary goal called the award. The last one wins, or as the Catchphrase series goes, “There can be only one.”
If you want to go deeper more than that, check our rules Haylander video. Or, as you know, witness Haylander Be happier.
The first film was held on New York’s conversation and ended with our hero Connor McCleid, where he defeated the last Khaled and won the award. The ring was completely closed to the story. Therefore, when it is time to create a complement, there were many narrative obstacles as well as production problems.
No one, end Haylander Remove the immortality of Connor, the great hook of the entire concept. In addition, all other immortals have now died, including a friend and teacher Connor, Ramirez, who was played by Sean Connery. They would return to him regardless of what was a great and very enjoyable actor in the first movie.
How to (no) make Highlander 2
So, how do you deal with all these issues? Well, the original version of Haylander II: acceleration Make some extremist decisions. The largest one had to do with the origin of our heroes and their supernatural abilities. In theatrical pieces Haylander IIThe story is returned to the immortals as foreigners of a planet called Zest.
In the first movie, the acceleration was an explosion of the spiritual energy that one of the immortals lived after another slaughter. In sequel, it is restarted in a magic force that connects Connor and Ramirez and allows the Ramirez resurrection.
It goes without saying that this will not fly with the lovers of the original movie, but we have a lot of problems to deal with them more than just fans.
The story was appointed next year of 2024 and most of them revolve around the shield, a electromagnetic barrier that was created to protect humans from solar radiation. It works, but it also threw the planet on a permanent night and was used by a large group of greed.
The completely wonderful science fiction concept, but not something that seems to be really in line with the imagination of original sword work. Despite the design of production Haylander II Unnamed denial, the Dystopian preparation for 2024 made the fans stained. As a person who lived through the actual 2024, I can link.
Director Russell Mulkahi has returned to a continuation, and a talent time to employ the visual film industry, but Molkahi has finished production. Haylander II He was shooting in Argentina, but he was eventually moving production when Argentina’s economy suffered from a destructive crash.
At some point during all this chaos, the film’s bonds and some investors managed to control it Haylander IIMolkahi and any of his creative influence were taken outside the picture.
A terrible version
It goes without saying, made Haylander II He was an ambitious, bold and convicted endeavor. The theatrical pieces that were released without MULCHY were ridiculed by critics and the fans rejected, and opened third in the box office at the opening weekend.
Our favorite critic of fleeing Roger Ebert gave the movie 0.5 rare star and called it an incomprehensible name. We stand with Roger on this one. Haylander II: accelerationThe theatrical cut is a mixed and inverted movie with a little recommended outside the table. As I have some nostalgia for this version of the movie, it is legally bad.
After it became a notorious fluctuation and until it was called one of the worst films in all ages, director Russell Molkahi managed to oversee new pieces Haylander II It is called “mutual version”. In this pieces, any signals are removed to the planet Zest or changed to refer to the fictional, fictional past instead of a foreign planet.
You can also get some editing repairs. For example, the theatrical pieces together combine a separate sword between Connor and the main villain of the movie, Katana, which Michael Aironside plays. In the Renegade version, these two battles are fully restored. I will not say no to Michael Aironside.
The Renegade version has become easily accessible Haylander II: acceleration After its release, and because it was seen as improved, there was no major demand for home video versions of theatrical pieces.
So, what you did not see Haylander II In the theater, in the original VHS or Laserdissc version, or caught it on TV again in the 1990s, you never watched the original movie. This day continues with copies available on a large scale of the film either the rebellious version or the special version, another clip that has been reshaped that adds new CG effects.
See, there is no doubt that the rebel version is re -editing it Haylander II Outstanding the theatrical pieces. It is still a great movie and is still a very bad complement, but it is definitely a more monitoring piece of movies editing and stories from theatrical pieces.
However, the fact that Haylander II: accelerationThe theatrical pieces have been completely cut completely not something I support. This version of the film is part of the history of the film and deserves to be preserved, archive and general access. Just because my maker Haylander II I made a mistake with their complement, does not mean that they should get the erasure of history.
I am sure that there are people who love the osmosis version Haylander II They deserve a high -quality version of that to see it. Just because the movie is bad, it does not mean that it should not be present. Haylander II: acceleration It is a failure and those who forget their failures are sentenced to repeat them. Maybe for this reason there was no good Haylander Film since the first one!
If there are any defenders of the Zust there, I must hear from you in the comments. Give the video similar and subscribe to the channel if this is the type of things you want to see more than here in Giant Freakin Robot. Even next time, try not to lose your head.